Fair Market Value vs. Current Market Leverage
How pharmaceutical manufacturers should consider their Fair Market Value cost assessment compared to their negotiation leverage when contracting for distribution services.
Fair Market Value vs. Current Market Leverage
Fair Market Value (FMV) is a legal concept in the pharmaceutical industry that defines the appropriate amount to pay for services. It’s a critical component of compensation arrangements and a regulatory compliance issue. FMV reports help determine the value of bona fide service fees rendered during government price reporting and provide financial guardrails during wholesaler distribution service agreement negotiations. They are often referenced to justify certain fees the manufacturer cannot exceed. While no single formula is defined by law to guide the development of FMV calculations, should an entity be investigated for violating the False Claims Act or Anti-Kickback Statute, its FMV calculations will be highly scrutinized. Therefore, FMV calculations are typically created using analyses and feedback from internal compliance, outside legal counsel, and consultant firms and must be carefully documented with regular internal and external reviews.
Given the rigor and expense of developing FMV calculations and the sensitivity of pricing negotiations, they are treated as highly confidential information. Their existence is often shared with wholesalers in service fee negotiations to justify arguments for lower price points. Wholesalers frequently push back against FMV arguments during negotiations, insisting that these fees do not account for the full range of services they provide. They are keenly aware of their own costs and thus are motivated to maximize fees during manufacturer negotiations to achieve margins consistent with “like” brands.
Before these negotiations commence, each party must assess its Current Market Leverage (CML), which we are redefining from a financial debt risk metric to the degree of leverage each party believes it can exert. Pharma can use this as a valuable strategic effort to help align financial and operational expectations within the organization.
We recommend that pharmaceutical manufacturers consider several key questions when determining their CML. Read the full article to learn more.
For additional insights on this topic, you may also enjoy the following:
Archbow Consulting Strengthens Leadership Team with Key Promotions
Strategic appointments reflect Archbow’s continued growth and commitment to delivering exceptional value to its clients.
Archbow Consulting: A Committed Partner to NASP
As the only national nonprofit organization representing all specialty pharmacy stakeholders, NASP plays a crucial role in advancing the specialty pharmacy field.
ECRM 2025: Key Trends & Opportunities
Uncovering insights in the pharmaceutical industry, including optimizing supply chain solutions and refining market access strategies.
SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to receive news and updates from Archbow Consulting
|